Sunset Provision
It is very important to note that the repeal of the estate tax may never
become a reality. The 2001 Act has a built in sunset provision which was
required to comply with the Congressional Budget Act of 1974. This means
that all provisions of the 2001 Act sunset for years beginning after
December 31, 2010, right after the Congressional elections of November
2010. Continued repeal of the estate tax will require Congress to re-enact
the legislation to keep the repeal alive. If this does not occur, the
estate tax is scheduled to return January 1, 2011 and will revert back to
the estate tax law that existed prior to the 2001 Act with a maximum
exemption of $1,000,000. Additionally, many changes can occur over the
next six years with shifts of power to new Presidents and legislative
players so we will continue to monitor the horizon for future changes in
the law.
Capital Gains Tax and Carryover Basis
Under current law a person incurs a tax on capital gains earned upon the
sale of a capital asset. The amount of gain that a person realizes is
determined by subtracting their adjusted cost basis in the property from
the proceeds received from the sale of the property. Under current law and
until the estate tax is repealed, a person who receives an asset as the
result of a transfer upon death receives a step-up in basis so that their
cost basis in the property received is generally equal to the fair market
value of the property at the time of the decedent’s death. On the other
hand, if a person receives an asset as a lifetime gift, his or her basis
in the property is the same as the transferor’s cost-basis. This is
referred to as carry-over basis.
The 2001 Act imposes a carry-over basis on heirs who receive property from
a decedent after January 1, 2010. This means that heirs will inherit a
decedent’s property with a cost basis equal to the lesser of the
decedent’s adjusted cost basis or the fair market value of the property on
the date of the decedent’s death. While the estate will not pay estate tax
on the assets, the heirs will likely incur capital gains tax if and when
they sell the assets.
However, a decedent’s executor will be permitted to increase the adjusted
cost basis in a decedent’s property to the lesser of $1.3 Million or the
actual value of the property. Also, the cost basis of certain property
transferred to a surviving spouse may be increased up to $3.0 Million.
Certain property like retirement plan assets would not qualify for this
cost basis adjustment.
Gift Tax
The gift tax on transfers made during lifetime is not repealed by the 2001
Act. Instead the gift tax rates are set to decrease with the reduction in
the highest marginal estate tax rates. Beginning in 2010 the highest
marginal gift tax rate will be equal to the highest income tax rate
(probably 35%).
The amount exempt from gift taxes has also increased with the estate tax
exemption, however, it is capped at $1.0 Million. This means that a donor
can now exempt up to $1.0 Million from gift taxes. Please be aware that
the exemption does not increase like the estate tax exemption. Payment of
tuition or medical expenses paid directly to the school or health care
provider on behalf of another person is not taxable regardless of the cost
of such services. Additionally, the current annual exclusion amount from
gift tax for gifts directly to a person other than your spouse has
increased to $12,000 and is indexed for inflation. However, as previously
stated, if a person receives an asset as a lifetime gift, his or her basis
in the property is the same as the transferor’s cost-basis.
Additional Estate Tax Changes on the Horizon?
The United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate
have recently sought to make additional changes to the Federal estate tax
law.
In each of the last two years, the House has passed a bill that would
eliminate the sunset provisions of the estate tax causing the 2010 estate
tax repeal to be permanent. This measure was defeated in the Senate in
2002 and is not likely to pass the Senate in 2003 due to the fact that 60
votes are required for passage.
On March 20, 2003, the Senate voted by a vote of 51 to 48 to accelerate
the date of repeal of the estate tax by one year to January 1, 2009. This
move was done as part of the Senate’s effort to establish a budget for
Fiscal year 2004. Once completed, the Senate budget resolution must then
be reconciled with the House budget resolution. Even if the repeal of the
estate tax does not get moved up as part of the 2004 budget, this recent
move by the Senate indicates a desire by a majority in the Senate to
accomplish the repeal of the Federal estate tax before January 1, 2010.
Of course, any changes to the law of taxation are subject to further
change and are dependent on who holds office, the state of the economy and
a number of other factors.
North Carolina Gift and Estate Tax
While the Federal gift tax exemption increased to $1,000,000 effective for
gifts to non-spouse/non-charity beneficiaries occurring on or after
January 1, 2002, the North Carolina gift tax exemption remains at
$100,000, and this $100,000 exemption applies only to gifts to direct
descendants (known as Class A beneficiaries). In particular, North
Carolina taxes lifetime transfers to nieces and nephews and unrelated
beneficiaries (including in-laws) at a much higher rate than children or
other descendants, and non-descendants are not entitled to any gift tax
exemption beyond the $12,000 annual exclusion. The result is the first
dollar over $12,000 of property transferred by gift to non-descendants is
subject to North Carolina gift tax. Like Federal gift tax law, North
Carolina does recognize unlimited charitable and marital deductions.
With regard to the estate tax, North Carolina eliminated its separate
inheritance tax in 1999 and has since been dependent on a portion of the
Federal estate tax known as the state death tax credit. The state death
tax credit is the amount states such as North Carolina receive from the
Federal estate tax. It is a relatively simple calculation. Under the 2001
Federal Act, the state death tax credit will be reduced by 25% for estates
of decedents dying in 2002, 50% for estates of decedents dying in 2003,
75% for estates of decedents dying in 2004, and 100% for estates of
decedents dying in 2005 and beyond.
North Carolina has decided not recognize this phase out of the state death
tax credit. This further complicates the estate tax predicament for North
Carolina residents since the amount of estate tax paid to the North
Carolina Department of Revenue as part of the state death tax credit is
determined by reference to Federal law as it existed prior to the 2001
Act. Further, given our state’s growing deficit, it is possible that North
Carolina could re-introduce its own inheritance tax, which would be
completely independent of Federal law.
Planning Under the 2001 Act
From an estate planning perspective the 2001 Act has made some significant
changes that will impact how we plan for the future. A significant number
of people will no longer be subject to the tax simply because of the
increase in the exemption. However, with repeal not scheduled to occur
until 2010, many people are going to be faced with the same estate and
gift tax issues with a slightly lower net tax liability. The likelihood of
additional changes further complicates the planning process. Even if the
Federal estate tax is repealed, there may be new issues as far as capital
gains tax and the carry-over basis provisions that will become effective.
In short, the need for a comprehensive plan, developed by an attorney who
specializes in the area of estate planning, will remain well into the
future and taxpayers should not be lulled into a false sense of security
by the headlines and sound bites in the media touting a repeal of the
death tax.
What to Do Now
It is now appropriate to review and possibly revise plans that currently
fund the credit shelter trusts to the maximum available exemption amount.
That funding formula may no longer be appropriate if the combined family
assets do not exceed the higher exemption amounts. The termination of
certain trusts that were designed to avoid tax at the second death of the
husband and wife and the elimination of the administrative burden and
expense associated with those trusts may also be appropriate. The review
of insurance policies that were purchased to pay estate tax is also
recommended.